Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24897 (HP)

PAWAN VIKRANT v. NEENA

CMP/23528/2026 · 2026-09-28

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Pawan Vikrant vs. Neena & ors. FAO No. 271 of 2016 28.9.2026 Present: Dr. Nidhi Singh, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. None for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. CMP No. 23528 of 2026 By way of present application, indulgence of this Court has been sought to release the amount of compensation, falling to the share of appellant/applicant. In view of no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents/non-applicants, amount of compensation falling to the share of appellant/applicant, as per the apportionment made by this Court, while deciding the appeal, alongwith proportionate interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant. The amount, so released, shall be remitted to the bank account of the applicant, as per the particulars mentioned in the application. The application is, thus, disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge September 28, 2026 (kalpana)