M/s Y.V.R Projects Private Limited v. Sashi Bhushan Kumar
CC/4407/2024 · 2026-01-01
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24894 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24894 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010521612024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4407/2024 Between:
1. M/S Y.V.R PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, REP, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, YARRAM NITIN REDDY, S/O VENKATESWARA REDDY, AGED- 37 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, ADDRESS- ENDECOS COUNTY APARTMENTS, CZECH COLONY, SANATH NAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. KRISHNA TEJA, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. RAJA KUMARI GANIYA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYAT WING), NANDYAL DISTRICT, NADYAL.
4. K NAGA RAJU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.
5. PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRATARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRATERIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2 HBKM,J C.C.No.4407 of 2024
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 11.09.2024 made in W.P. No. 17890 OF 2024 and pass su Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SOURI BABU DUPPATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
3 HBKM,J C.C.No.4407 of 2024
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with and no cause survives in this contempt case.
2. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
02.01.2026 PGT