Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24892 (JHR)

MALTI DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6848/2026 · 2026-09-02

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26481 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.6848 of 2026 ----- 1. Malti Devi, aged about 50 years, wife of Devnath Mahto, resident of village Pancha, P.O. + P.S. Ormanjhi, District- Ranchi 2. Sunita Devi, aged about 54 years, Wife of Sevaram Mahto, resident of village Gurgai, P.O. Palu, P.S. Ormanjhi, District- Ranchi 3. Mudrika Devi, aged about 51 years, Wife of Ramnath Mahto, resident of P.O. + P.S.+ Mahadec Tola, Barlong, District- Ramgarh … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, having its office at Ramgarh, P.O. + P.S. + District Ramgarh. 3. L.R.D.C, Ramgarh, having its office at Ramgarh, P.O. + P.S. + District Ramgarh. 4. Circle Officer, Mandu, having its office at Ramgarh, P.O. + P.S. Mandu, District-Ramgarh 5. Tata Steel Company West Bokaro, Ghatotand through its General Manager, Ramgarh, having its office at Ghatotand, P.O. P.S. Mandu District- Ramgarh …….Respondents 6. Shanti Devi, wife of Shri Vishun Mahto, resident of village Atna Piparagadha, P.O.+ P.S.+ District Ramgarh …….. Proformer Respondent CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shivam Kumar, AC to AG For the Resp. No. 5 : Mr. Manish Mishra, Advocate …...... 02 /02.09.2026: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 02.09.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 03.09.2026