ULFAT BI v. NASEEM JAVED CHOUDHARY, DIRECTOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, JAMMU AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/215/2026 · 2026-08-14
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2489 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2489 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 215/2026
Ulfat Bi …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. P N Bhat, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Urvashi Kichloo, Advocate
UT of J&K & Ors .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (14.08.2026)
01. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdrawn the instant contempt petition, as the respondents have assured that the grievance of the petitioner will be redressed.
02. In the light of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition is disposed of.
03. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
14.08.2026
Vijay
S. No. 137 Vijay Kumar 2026.08.14 16.59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu