MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION v. THE REGIONAL PF COMMISSIONER -II
WP/1955/2022 · 2026-06-30
Jyoti M
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24887 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24887 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32327 WP No. 1955 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 1955 OF 2022 (L-PF) BETWEEN:
1.
MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, TIGER CIRCLE ROAD, MADHAV NAGAR, MANIPAL, KARNATAKA - 576104.
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
2.
MANIPAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, UDUPI-KARKALA ROAD, EASHWAR NAGAR, MANIPAL, KARNATAKA - 576104.
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VINAY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE REGIONAL PF COMMISSIONER -II EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
"BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN", TULUNADU TOWERS, COURT ROAD, REGIONAL OFFICE, UDUPI - 576101.
2.
THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEE PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION HEAD OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, 14- BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI- 110066.
(DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 02.03.2023)
3.
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32327 WP No. 1955 of 2022
SHRAM SADAN, YESHWANTHPUR, TUMKUR ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560022.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RAJINI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.PRAMODA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. TIMMANNA BHAT, CGA FOR R3;
VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 02.03.2023, R2 IS DELETED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Vinay., counsel on behalf of Sri.Manmohan.P.N., for the petitioners and Smt.Rajini., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.Pramod., for respondent No.1 have appeared in person.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayer sought in the writ petition does not survive for
consideration. Counsel, therefore, submits that the petition may be disposed of as does not survive for
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32327 WP No. 1955 of 2022
consideration. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the same.
The oral submission is placed on record.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as does not survive for consideration.
Because of disposal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41