Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24882 (HP)

M/S BANSAL GENERATION LIMITED v. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD

EX.P/17/2025 · 2026-09-28

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.17 of 2025 Decided on: 28th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/s Bansal Generation Ltd. …..Petitioner Versus Ajmer Vidyut Nigam Limited .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta (through video conference) and Ms. Kalaunta Devi, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner/Decree Holder seeks enforcement of award dated 03.11.2018 passed by the Learned Arbitrator. The respondent/judgment debtor has, inter alia, taken an objection that the petitioner/decree holder has already preferred Execution Petition No.13 of 2023 for enforcement of the same award, which is still pending adjudication and is between the same parties as involved in the instant execution petition, therefore, this second execution petition is not maintainable. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the instant execution petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner for seeking redressal of its grievances qua enforcement of the aforesaid award raised in this execution petition, in Execution Petition No.13 of 2023. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent/ judgment debtor does not oppose the prayer, however, submits that the rights and contentions of the respondent/ judgment debtor in that regard be protected. In view of above, the present execution petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. All rights and contentions of both the parties, i.e. petitioner/decree holder and respondent/judgment debtor concerning the issues/grievances raised in this execution petition are left open for adjudication. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 28, 2026 Judge Mukesh