HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 905 of 2026 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Order on Delay condonation Application The cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of the application is sufficient to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay in filing the revision is, hereby, condoned. The revision be treated to be filed within time. Order on Revision. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. The present criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist with prayer to allow the revision and set aside the impugned order dated 24.12.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Junior Division), Banda in Criminal Misc. Case NO. 57/XI/2025 by which the learned trial court has dismissed the application u/s 173(4) BNSS. It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case, an application under Section 173(4) BNSS was filed by the revisionist to direct the police station to lodge an F.I.R. against the opposite party nos. 2 and 3. The facts in brief were that the revisionist was coming back to his house by motorcycle on 26.10.2025 at about 9.30 p.m. and when he arrived at bypass Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mukesh Kumar Khare, Om Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kuldeep Kumar .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) road Tindwari, the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 came out and stop the motorcycle and then committed marpeet with the revisionist and also caused damage to the motorcycle. The revisionist sustained injuries on his abdomen and ribs. In the meantime, a truck passed on the road as a result the accused persons went away by threatening him. He called police on dial 100 which took him to the hospital and thereafter he went to the police station to lodge the F.I.R. but it was not lodged. He sent an application through registered post to S.S.P. but no action was taken as a result he filed present application before the learned court but it was rejected vide order dated 24.12.2025 illegally. The learned trial court must have treated the application as complaint but failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it, therefore, request to set it aside the order passed by learned court and allow the revision. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid and contended that in this case, all the facts are in the knowledge of the revisionist and it does not require any investigation or recovery, therefore, he may have an option to file complaint in this regard. He also contended that no cognizable offence is disclosed from contents of the application moved by the revisionist. As a result no such direction can be given to the police to lodge the F.I.R. There is no any medical report supporting the allegation of the revisionist. The parcha from District Hospital Banda has been filed on which some medicines are mentioned but there is no mention of injuries on the person of the injured/revisionist. All these facts were taken into consideration by the learned trial court while passing the order in question. On considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. perusal of record, the contents of the application under Section 173(4) BNSS and order dated 24.12.2025 passed by learned trial court, it appears that though there is allegation of marpeet by opposite party nos. 2 and 3 with the revisionist causing injuries on his abdomen and ribs but there is a parcha from district Hospital Banda in which only 2-3 medicines are mentioned but there is no mention of any injury CRLRD No. 905 of 2026 2 present on the person of the injured/revisionist to show that he sustained injuries on his person in the incident. On the other hand, all the facts are in the knowledge of the revisionist himself and matter does not require any kind of recovery or search, therefore, he may have an option to file complaint against them in this regard and order passed by learned trial court dated 24.12.2025 will not come in the way as bar. Accordingly, the order passed by learned trial court does not require any interference by this Court and this criminal revision is dismissed. May 6, 2026 Anurag Singh CRLRD No. 905 of 2026 3 (Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad