Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24877 (CHH)

Sukhdeo v. Nunu Dai and others

SA/426/2016 · 2026-07-02

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:27477 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 426 of 2016 1 - Sukhdeo S/o Heera Ram, Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ...............Plaintiff ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Nunu Dai And Others W/o Duryodhan, Aged About 83 Years R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Toshram S/o Late Duryodhan, Aged About 44 Years R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, 4 - Krishanchand S/o Milkunwar, R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, 5 - Keshav Prasad S/o Kripasindhu, R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, 6 - Mahendra Kumar S/o Kripasindhu, R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, 2 7 - Birendra Kumar S/o Kripasindhu, R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, 8 - Chain Singh S/o Motiram, R/o Village- Saraipali, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent No.2 : Shri Anand Bajaj, Advocate For Respondent / State : Shri Aman Tamboli, Advocate ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 03/07/2026 None appeared for the appellant despite repeated calls. This Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.07.06 14:30:37 +0530