Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24877 (AP)

Kareti Krishna Mohan Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26942/2025 · 2026-01-27

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010523602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 26942/2025 Between: 1. KARETI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO,, S/O VEERA RAGAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS. R/O 5-1-21/1, CHUNCHUPALLI VILLAGE, KOTHAGUDEM MANDAL, BHADRADRI- KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT TELANGANA STATE. 2. DULLA VEERANJANEYULU,, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O 13-19-47, PINAPADU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DULLA VENKATA NARASIMHA RAO,, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59YEARS, R/O 13-19-46, PINAPADU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. KARETI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O VISHNUVARDHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O 3-2-225/1, CHUNCHUPALLI VILLAGE, KOTHAGUDEM MANDAL, BHADRADRI-KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT TELANGANA STATE. 5. DULLA RAMACHANDRA RAO,, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O 13-19-34, PINAPADU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. DULLA GOPI, S/O SRINIVASARAO, AGED 30 YEARS R/O 13- 19-33, PINAPADU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, 2 VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to DECLARE the action of the Respondent officials in high handedly interfering with our peaceful possession and enjoyment of subject tank situated in property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 2-93 cents in Survey No. 137 (Old Survey No. 148), Pinapadu village of Tenali Mandal, Guntur District, without following the procedure established by law, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India besides violation of several Judgments passed by this Hon'ble Court and consequently COMMAND the Respondent officials not to interfere with our possession and enjoyment of the subject property without following due procedure established by law, in the interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the Respondent officials not to interfere with our peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring as extent of Ac. 2-93 cents in Survey No. 137 (Old Survey No. 148), Pinapadu village of Tenali Mandal, Guntur District, in the interest of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. J.V.PHANIDUTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the writ petition. 2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners are permitted to work out their remedies as per law. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 28.01.2026 NNN