Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24871 (JHR)

GULAM MUSTAFA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8130/2026 · 2026-09-03

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26675 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8130 of 2026 Gulam Mustafa, Aged about 35 years, S/o Nasiruddin Ansari, R/o Village Jhagrudih, P.O. Chatro, P.S. Bhelwaghati, District Giridih, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Advocate --- 03/3rd September 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2026 in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Section 109/115(2)/118(1)/303(2)/61/76/338/352/351(2) r/w 3(5) of B.N.S. pending in the court of Learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused and the informant are next-door neighbours and there was a quarrel between the parties over the issue of drainage of rainwater between their houses. There is a case and counter-case arising out of the alleged occurrence. The allegations made in the FIR are general and omnibus in nature and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent. The co-accused, namely, Nasiruddin Ansari has been enlarged on bail by this Court in B.A. No. 8026 of 2026 vide order dated 31.08.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, he does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Nasiruddin Ansari has been granted bail by this Court, charge-sheet has already been submitted 2026:JHHC:26675 2 and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarge on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. (vi) The petitioner shall not disturb the informant or her family members in any manner whatsoever. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 03.09.2026 Uploaded On: 03.09.2026 Mukul/-