- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32404 WP No. 43305 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 43305 OF 2016 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: MR. S.G. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE GANGADHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT: SINGASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560068 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MATEEN KHAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE AIRCRAFT EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.15, 1ST CROSS, C.K.C. GARDEN, K.H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2; Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32404 WP No. 43305 of 2016 SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT NO.3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN RESPECT OF LANDS BEARING SY.NO.106/5 MEASURING 1 ACRES 24 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.105/1 MEASURING 5 ACRES 0.01 GUNTAS SITUATED IN SINGASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, STANDS LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND CONSEQUENTLY HOLD THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN RESPECT OF ABOVE SAID LANDS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 BY ISSUANCE OF THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION ON 05.09.1988 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION ON 28.09.1989 (ANNEXURES-B AND C) HAS NO LEGAL EFFECT IN THE EYE OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65