( 2026:JHHC:26413 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8129 of 2026 ------ Subham @ Shubham @ Shubham Yadav @ Akash Ranjan, aged about 31 years, son of Late Vijay Bihari Yadav @ Vijay Yadav, resident of Near Hira Tent House, Gwaltoli, Bada Bazar, P.O. & P.S.-Sadar, Dist.-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 02.09.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Hazaribagh Sadar P.S. Case No.169 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/118(1)/352/ 351(2)/351(3)/109(1)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant by assaulting him with buckle of the belt worn by him. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and admittedly the quarrel took place between the petitioner and the informant in respect of the informant directing the petitioner to remove his vehicle from the road. It is next submitted that no injury has been sustained by the informant as paragraph nos.62 and 63 of the case diary, goes to show that the informant could not produce any injury report or OPD slip in spite of being repeatedly asked by the I.O. of the case, to produce the same. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.12 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.07.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Hazaribagh, in connection with Hazaribagh Sadar P.S. Case No.169 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 02.09.2026 Gunjan-