Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24863 (AP)

Sri.E.Jagadish v. Smt. Y.V. Anuradha

CC/1487/2014 · 2026-03-17

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010523602014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1487/2014 Between: 1. SRI.E.JAGADISH,, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: EX.EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.2-85, VELLATURU, G.KONDUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 229. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT Y V ANURADHA, COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAKNAGAR, ABIDS, HYDERABAD 2. SRI V TRINADH, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SHRI DURGAMALLESWARA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, INDRAKEELADRI, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTFRICT - 520 001. 3. SRI KOTESHWARA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SHRI DURGAMALLESWARA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, INDRAKEELADRI, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520 001. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be Pleased to punish the respondents for not paying the salary payable from month of October, 2012 to December, 2013 as per the provisions of the contempt of Court Act by willfully violating the order dated 06-11-2013 passed by His Lordship Sri Justice Noushad Ali in WPMP No.34032 of 2013 in W.P.No.27459 of 2013. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. S ASHOK ANAND KUMAR 3. V T M PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.27459 of 2013 was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court by an order dated 31.12.2024. In view of the said order and the dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:18.03.2026 PNS