110 1 CWP-5124-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5124-2026 Date of decision:-29.04.2026 Anuradha Yadav ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present :- Ms. Rashi Shahrawat, Advocate for the petitioner (THROUGH V.C.) Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 – HSVP. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available to her in accordance with law. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) 29.04.2026 JUDGE Brij Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2026.04.29 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh