Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24859 (KAR)

SRI C V VENUGOAPAL REDDY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12033/2026 · 2026-06-24

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31371 WP No. 12033 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 12033 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI C V VENUGOPALA REDDY S/O LATE D.A. VENKATARAYA REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT CHIKKAPYLAGURKI VILLAGE MANDIKALLU HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK-562104. 2. SRI.C.V.RAMESH BABU S/O LATE D.A. VENKATARAYA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.13, 1ST FLOOR DODDABOMASANDRA VIDYARANYAPURA POST BANGALORE 560097. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMESH KUMAR V, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPURA – 562101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31371 WP No. 12033 of 2026 3. THE TAHASILDAR CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B P RADHA, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ORDER OR GIVE DIRECTION COMMANDING RESPONDENT NO.3 TAHASILDAR, CHICKABALLAPUR TALUK TO FORTHWITH CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION/REPRESENTATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF THE EXTENT OF 2 GUNTAS OF LAND IN RTC AND MUTATION IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY. NO.65, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 32 AUNTAS, SITUATED AT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, AS PER ANNEXURE-F DATED 08.10.2024 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners sought for a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the representation for rectification of the extent of 02 Guntas of land in the RTC, pursuant to the order dated 29.07.2024 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.2. 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.3 is - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31371 WP No. 12033 of 2026 directed to consider the representation at Annexure-F within a period of three months from the receipt of a copy of this order, in the light of the order passed by respondent No.2 at Annexure-D. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32