Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24858 (MAD)

M/s. Frist Energy 10 Private Limited v. The District Collector

WP Crl./1149/2026 · 2026-05-13

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 __________Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 M/s. Frist Energy 10 Private Limited Represented by its Authorised Representative, Mr.Egambaram Muniyan Having its registered Office at II Floor, Door No. 11, Kalaivanar Nagar, Padi , Chennai - 600 050. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the respondents herein to consider the representation and provide adequate police protection to the petitioner company for the purpose of installation, erection and commissioning of High Tension Current Lines and poles from the Wind farm at Palayam, Karur to the Karur pooling Substation (230 kV), Karur District, Tamil Nadu. WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 __________Page 2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Ravindran, Senior Counsel For Mr.Athisaya.C.G. For Respondents: Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.03.2026 and to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner/company for the purpose of installation, erection and commissioning of High Tension Current Lines and poles from the Wind Farm at Palayam, Karur to the Karur pooling Sub-station (230 kV), Karur District, Tamil Nadu. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. Mr.A.Damodaran, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who takes notice for the respondents, submitted that the respondents have not received the petitioner’s representation so far. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 16.03.2026 had already been received by the respondents and he has also furnished the copy of acknowledgment. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 __________Page 3 of 4 5. In reply, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the respondents will consider the same and act in accordance with law, if the said representation is on file. 6. Recording the abovesaid submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.03.2026, conduct enquiry and take appropriate action and dispose of the same in accordance with law, without any delay. 7. With the abovesaid direction, this Writ petition(Criminal) is disposed of. 13-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MFA To 1. The District Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 2. The Superintendent of Police Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 __________Page 4 of 4 P.DHANABAL J. MFA WP Crl. No. 1149 of 2026 13-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis