- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32046 WP No. 2514 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2514 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT MUTHAMMA W/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE AND POST VIRAJPET TALUK S KODAGU - 571 218 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHIVAPPA B C S/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE AND POST VIRAJPET TALUK S KODAGU - 571 218 2. B S JEEVAN S/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE AND POST VIRAJPET TALUK S KODAGU - 571 218 3. B S JAYA S/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32046 WP No. 2514 of 2021 4. B S POOVAPPA S/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE AND POST VIRAJPET TALUK S KODAGU - 571 218 5. B S CHINAPPA S/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE AND POST VIRAJPET TALUK S KODAGU - 571 218 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKAS M., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4 R1, R2 AND R5 ARE SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2020 PASSED ON IA NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 5 OF CPC IN MISC APPEAL NO.6/2020 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET VIDE ANNX- A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32046 WP No. 2514 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo indicating that the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. The memo reads as under: "The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that O.S.No.48 of 2019 filed by the Respondent No.1 and 2 has been dismissed vide Judgment and Decree dated 20.12.2024. It is further submitted that M.A.No.06 of 2020, which had been filed challenging the order passed in the said suit, has also been withdrawn on 20.06.2024. Consequently, the present petition does not survive for consideration and has become infructuous. Hence, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take this memo on record and dispose of the above petition as having become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity." 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26