Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24848 (KAR)

M/S K.N.S. HAJEE SHEIKH ABDUL KHADER LABBAI SAHIB CO. (PVT) LTD v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS

WP/21515/2022 · 2026-06-22

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30678 WP No. 21515 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 21515 OF 2022 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN: 1. M/S K.N.S. HAJEE SHEIKH ABDUL KHADER LABBAI SAHIB CO. (PVT) LTD., LABBAL SAHIB CO PVT LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER NO.320 PRESENT NO.W-84 OLD THARAGUPET BENGALURU -560 053. 2. THE DIRECTOR M/S K N S HAJEE SHEIKH ABDUL KHADER LABBAI SAHIB CO PVT LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER NO.320, PRESENT NO.W-84 OLD THARAGUPET BENGALURU - 560 053. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NISHANTH A V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU -560 052. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30678 WP No. 21515 of 2022 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MASJID-E-JAMATH-E-LABABEEN NO.470 AVENUE ROAD BENGALURU -560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT/MUTHAVALLI MR. V R MOHAMMED AKBAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE V R ABDUL SUBHAN. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMAD NIYAZ S., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MAHMOOD PATEL., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN APPLICATION NO.31/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA WAQF TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU. SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2022 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.31/2016 BY THE KARNATAKA WAQF TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30678 WP No. 21515 of 2022 ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of change in the law, namely Sub-section (9) of Section 83 of the Wakf Act, providing for filing an appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal, he seeks leave of this Court to file the appeal as contemplated thereunder against the order impugned in this petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the interim order of protection which was granted by this Court be extended for a period of four weeks and the time consumed in prosecuting this petition be exempted for computation of the limitation. 3. Submission is placed on record. 4. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30678 WP No. 21515 of 2022 5. The interim order granted by this Court is extended for a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Time consumed in prosecuting this petition shall be exempted for the purpose of limitation, if the appeal is filed within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27