KUSHAL BANERJEE ALIAS AMIT BANERJEE ALIAS AMIT MUKHARJEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1924/2026 · 2026-09-03
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24848 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24848 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:26699 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1924 of 2026
Kushal Banerjee @ Amit Banerjee @ Amit Mukherjee, aged about 45 years, S/o Parag Ranjan Banerjee, R/o 453, Netaji Colony, Baranagar, Naopara, P.O. & P.S. Netaji Nagar, Kolkata, West Bengal.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl. PP
---
11/03.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with C.I.D. P.S. Case No. 42 of 2024, registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 470, 471, 120-B, and 34 of the IPC and Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending in the court of learned A.J.C.-XVIII-cum-Special Judge, C.I.D./A.T.S., Ranchi.
3. After some arguments, when this Court was not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in view of the specific reference to the materials collected against the petitioner mentioned in the supplementary counter-affidavit filed by the opposite party, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:03.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:03.09.2026