Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2484 (ORI)

MADHUSUDAN MAHAPATRA v. STATE OF ODISHA(VIG.)

ABLAPL/1006/2026 · 2026-02-06

R K Pattanaik

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.807 of 2026 Pramila Mahapatra …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Jena, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha (Vigilance) …. Opposite Party Mr. M.S. Rizvi, ASC (Vigilance And ABLAPL No.1006 of 2026 Madhusudan Mahapatra …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Jena, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha (Vigilance) …. Opposite Party Mr. M.S. Rizvi, ASC (Vigilance CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 06.02.2026 01. 1. Both the APLAPLs are disposed of by the following common order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. Instant petitions have been filed under Section 482 BNSS by the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Bhubaneswar Vigilance P.S. Case No.25 of 2014 corresponding to T.R. Case No.22 of 2025 pending in the court of learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar on the grounds stated. p. 2 4. Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1. A copy of the chargesheet is at Annexure-2. Learned counsel for the Vigilance Department submits that the petitioners have not been arrested in connection with the case and hence, there is no apprehension of arrest at present. Mr. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be remanded upon their appearance before the learned court below. Considering the fact that the investigation is over and during such investigation, no arrest was caused and in the meantime, the chargesheet is filed with the closure of the investigation and the petitioners having been summoned by the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar, the Court is of the view that they should be allowed to appear and to go on bail in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No.25 dated 30th June, 2014 corresponding to T.R. Case No.22 of 2025 subject to suitable conditions. 5. Accordingly, it is ordered. 6. In the result, the ABLAPLs are disposed of with the direction as aforesaid. It is further directed that in the event, the petitioners appear before the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar in connection with Bhubaneswar Vigilance P.S. Case No.25 of 2014 corresponding to T.R. Case No.22 of 2025 within a fortnight from today or on the date fixed, whichever is earlier, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of p. 3 Rs.30,000/-(rupees thirty thousand) each with one solvent surety for the like amount each with such other conditions imposed as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge TUDU