Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2484 (JHR)

BHURU MAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11452/2025 · 2026-02-19

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5044 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 11452 of 2025 Bhuru Mal, aged about 32 years, son of Akhilesh Mal, resident of village Sonarpara, PO Dhamkapara, PS-Maheshpur, District Pakur (Jharkhand) ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anjani Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. V. S. Sahay, APP -------- Order No. 03 /Dated: 19th February 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 310(2), 311 of B.N.S., 2023 in connection with Pakur (T) PS Case No. 176 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. No. 176 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the co-accused, namely, Manjarul Sekh in B.A No. 8910 of 2025, Rinku Rajvar in B.A No. 9508 of 2025 and Zahiruddin Ansari in B.A. No. 9775 of 2025 have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.11.2025, 30.10.2025 and 11.11.2025 respectively and the petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2025 as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the fact that the co-accused have been granted bail in B.A No. 8910 of 2025, B.A No. 9508 of 2025 and B.A. No. 9775 of 2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2025, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) 2026:JHHC:5044 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with Pakur (T) PS Case No. 176 of 2025 Corresponding to S.T No. 176 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stand allowed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 19th February 2026 Amit Uploaded on 24/02/2026