Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24834 (CAL)

M/S BHARATIYA UDYOG RPTD BY PROP. SATISH KUMAR AGARWAL v. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR

WPA/13882/2021 · 2026-06-23

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

44 19.06.2026 Ct. No.07 J.Das IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 13882 of 2021 IA No.CAN/1/2026 M/s. Bharatiya Udyog represented by its Prop. Satish Kumar Agarwal Vs. State Bank of India & Ors. Mr. Dulal Dey …For the petitioner 1. An adjournment is prayed for on behalf of the petitioner to effect service of this application. 2. This is an application for seeking condonation of delay which was filed on 8 May 2026. The fact that the petitioner has not been able to effect service till date demonstrates that there is neither urgency nor diligence in proceeding with this application. As a last chance, let this matter appear on 23 June 2026. 3. In the absence of any proper and effective service appropriate orders for dismissal would be passed. 4. The pendency of this proceeding will not enure to the benefit of the petitioner and shall create no equity in respect of in any proceeding pending before any forum. The respondent bank is at liberty to act expeditiously in accordance with law for recovery of their lawful dues. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)