APHC010524562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10235/2025 Between: 1. SRIKANTH, S/O MASTAN BABU,AGED ABOUT 32YRS, OCC REAL ESTATE,R/O H.NO.2-7-453, JANDAMANU STREET,PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. MADHAN ALIAS M MADAN MOHAN REDDY, S/O M.VENKATA REDDY, OCC FORMAR, R/O H.NO.L-49-A, BALAIAHAGARIPALLE,GONDIPALLE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. P SHIVA REDDY, S/O KONDAREDDY,AGED ABOUT 42YRS, OCC TAILOR,R/O H.NO.2-7-525, JANDAMAN STREET,PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. VENKATA ZAPAL NAIDU ALIAS NAYUNI VENKATA VAJPAYEENAIDU, S/O LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30YRS,OCC NIL, R/O H.NO.4-8-263, RANGANADHA SWAMY TEMPLE,PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. TALAPULA LOKESH, S/O VENKATRAMANA,AGED ABOUT 36YRS, OCC PVT EMPLOYEE,R/O H.NO.5-8-256, VENKATAPURAM,PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. ROYAL LOKESH ALIAS KUNCHA LOKESH, S/O SIVASANKAR,AGED ABOUT 29YRS, OCC NIL,R/O H.NO.4-10-331, YS PAUL REDDY NAGAR,PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 2 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,AMARAVATI,THROUGH SHO, PULIVENDULA U POLICE STATION. 2. SHAIK FAYAZUNNISA, W/O. VALLI SAHEB, AGE 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, D.NO.1-5-294-1, NAGARIGUTTA, PULIVENDULA TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 09.10.2025 IN CRL.P.NO.10235 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest of the Petitioners/Accused No. 1, 2, 4,5,7 and 8 in the event of their arrest in connection with Cr.No.518/2025 of Pulivendula (U) Police Station, YSR Kadapa District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. KAMIREDDY DIVYA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. Chenna Reddy.K 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10235/2025 Order: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners/Accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8, in connection with Crime No.518 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 324(3)(4), 74, 79, 131, 298, 115(2), 189(2) read with 190 of BNS. 2. Heard Sri Kamireddy Divya, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 09.09.2025 at 12.30 p.m., wherein the Accused No.1 to 3 and others criminally trespassed into the complainant’s house, broke the main door and intervened the house and damaged TV and other materials. A4 also torn the jacket of complainant’s sister and outraged her modesty. All the accused beat the complainant with hands and kicked with legs and threatened him to give slogan Jaisriram. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are innocent and they are falsely implicated in the present crime due to past enmity between both the parties. Accused No.5 earlier lodged a complaint against the son of complainant and son of the complainant was also arrested. Out of grudge, the present complaint was lodged. Hence, prays to allow the petition. 4 5. Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, would submit that investigation is nascent stage and there are specific accusations against the petitioners. 6. A perusal of material on record would show that there are specific accusations made against the petitioners herein and it is submitted by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that investigation is in progress. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners at this stage. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.02.2026 ARB 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10235 of 2025 Date: 19.02.2026 ARB