MD TARIQUE ANWAR @ MD TAREEKH ANWAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(SJ)/459/2026 · 2026-09-02
Rajesh Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24831 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24831 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:26490 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.459 of 2026 ---------
1. Md. Tarique Anwar @ Md. Tareekh Anwar, Aged about 40 years, Son of Sarfuddin.
2. Md. Mukhtar Alam, Aged about 34 years, Son of md. Farid, Both Resident of Village Rajaun, belbadda, P.O & P.S. Belbadda, District Godda. ….. Appellants Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Pinku Kumar Das, Son of Sachcho Ram, Resident of Village Rajaun, Belbadda, P.O. & P.S. Belbadda, District Godda. ..... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--------- For the Appellants : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P For the Resp. No.02 : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate
--------- 04/ Dated: 02
nd September, 2026
1. The present criminal appeal has been filed against the order dated 24.03.2026, passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – 1st Godda, in A.B.P No.120 of 2026, whereby the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the appellants has been rejected in connection with Belbadda SC/ ST P.S. Case No.74 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 315/ 318/ 126/ 109/ 191/ 192 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(p), 3(1)(q), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the SC/ ST (POA) Act, pending in the court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Godda.
2. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Musheer Alam Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal, as the charge-sheet has already been submitted in the court below.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. - 1- Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.459 of 2026
2026:JHHC:26490
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 02nd September, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 03.09.2026 - 1- Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.459 of 2026