APHC010521232023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2736/2023 Between: 1. PILLI VIJAYA NIRMALA, W/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, AGE 49 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O 38TH WARD, LANKAPETA, BHIMAVARAM-2, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. PILLI MANI KUMAR,, S/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O 38TH WARD, LANKAPETA, BHIMAVARAM-2, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. PILLI JESSY,, S/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, W/O NALLI VENKAT, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O 38TH WARD, LANKAPETA, BHIMAVARAM-2, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PATTEM SUNDARA RAO, S/o Prakasa Rao, aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, R/o Balusumudi, Bhimavaram -2, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari Dist. ...RESPONDENT 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the order Dt. 20-07-2023 in I.A.No.114 of 2019 in 0.S.No. 249 of 2017 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Bhimavaram and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order Dt. 20-07-2023 in E.P.No. 114 of 2019 in O.S.No. 249 of 2017 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Bhimavaram, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass such other order(s) IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in CRP No. 2736 of 2023 on the file of this Honourable Court dated 19-10-2023 in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. M P V N V SASTRI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 18.12.2025, 10.02.2026 & 24.02.2026, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 10th March, 2026 RKS