Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:26703 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6774 of 2026
1. Manoj Mehta, aged about 45 years.
2. Kamlesh Mehta, aged about 36 years. Both Sons of Late Bhagi Mehta @ Bhagirath Mehta, resident of Village Pandey Tola, Domchanch, Post Office & Police Station Domchanch, District-Koderma (Jharkhand) … … Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate
For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, Advocate
06/03.09.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 09.06.2026 in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Section 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 126(2), 191(2), 190, 333, 351(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the 2 petitioners are brothers and they have been in custody since
09.06.2026. There is case and counter-case between the informant party and the petitioners. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. He has submitted that the victim in the present case has suffered grievous injury on leg, which is not a vital part of the body. He has further submitted that the parties are at peace with each other as of now.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant has also submitted that parties are at peace with each other and he has no objection, if the petitioners are enlarged on bail.
5.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has submitted that if the parties are at peace with each other, she has nothing to say.
2026:JHHC:26703 2
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is case and counter-case and charge- sheet has already been submitted and the informant has no objection so far as the prayer for bail is concerned, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not disturb the informant and his family members in any manner whatsoever. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (iii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iv) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of their single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (v) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with their mobile number before the learned court which they will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 03.09.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-03.09.2026