Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:812
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 24 of 2026 1 - Triveni Bai W/o Sukh Das, Aged About 60 Years R/o House No. 100, Amti, Anda, District Durg C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Collector Durg, District Durg C.G. 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Durg, District Durg C.G. 4 - Station House Officer, P.S. Anda, District Durg C.G. 5 - Tehsildar, Anda, District Durg C.G. 6 - Revenue Inspector, Anda, Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 7 - Patwari, Halka No. 30, Anda, Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 8 - Rajkumar Sahu S/o Bisahu Ram Sahu, R/o Village Amti, Tehsil And District Durg C.G.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Purnendra Khichariya, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 07/01
/2026
1. The petitioner is aggrieved with the inaction on the part of Tahsildar, Durg as despite order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, no proceeding has been initiated for evicting respondent No. 8.
2. Learned State counsel would submit that the disputed land is a government land, therefore, the petitioner has no right to claim on the disputed land and also to evict respondent No. 8 from the disputed land and would pray for dismissal of the writ petition.
3. From perusal of record, it is quite vivid that there is inter se dispute between the petitioner and respondent No. 8. Even otherwise, the disputed land is a government land, therefore, it is for the government to take action against any individual and the petitioner has no locus standi to file this petition.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2026.01.08 11:38:43 +0530