IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2325 of 2026 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Ranjna Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vipul Mehta, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that needful in the case of the petitioner in terms of judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2004 of 2017 titlted Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, shall be done within a period of four months, as has been undertaken before the Hon'ble Apex Court. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to ensure that needful in terms of the judgment, sought to be executed, is done expeditiously, preferably within a period for months, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 28,2026 (shankar)