- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30054 RSA No. 1888 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1888 OF 2013 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. THIMMAIAH, S/O THIMMEGOWDA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS, JAYAMMA, W/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, 2. KRISHNA, S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS, 3. THIMMAIAH, S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT DODDALAHALLI VILLAGE, UYYAMBALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 4. THAYAMMA , W/O LATE MUTHAIAH, D/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30054 RSA No. 1888 of 2013 R/AT PIPE LINE ROAD, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 5. NAGAMANI, W/O GURULINGAIAH, D/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS, R/AT KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 6. NAGU @ NAGAMMA, W/O SOMEGOWDA, D/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED 32 YEARS, R/AT NAGASHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE CITY - 560 032. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD N., ADVOCATE; SRI.SURESH G.V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: ANASUYAMMA , W/O RAMADASU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT DODDALAHALLI VILLAGE, UYAMMABALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.R.HEGDE HUDLAMANE., ADVOCATE) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30054 RSA No. 1888 of 2013 THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 7.8.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.115/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.6.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.586/1989 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., KANAKAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Case called. None appears for the appellants. Even on the last date of hearing, none appeared for the appellants. The matter was adjourned subject to payment of cost Rs.1,000/-. Despite being granted sufficient opportunity, the appellants have not turned up, and there is no representation by the appellants. 2. The appeal is of the year 2013, it shows that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30054 RSA No. 1888 of 2013 appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending interlocutory application/s, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11