2026:JHHC:26285 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7109 of 2026 Selim @ Salim Sk. Aged about 18 years son of Ejabul Sk, Resident of village – Banu Tola Goldhab Chuar, P.O. Pyarpur P.S. Radhanagar, District - Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Fahad Allam, APP --- 04/01.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.54 of 2026, registered under Sections 69, 115 (2), 351 (2), 352, 3 (5) of B.N.S., now pending in the court of learned J.M. Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2026 and the victim is a major. He submits that although it is alleged that some obscene photographs were captured, but no such material was collected during investigation. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that notice has been served upon the victim; however, nobody appears on her behalf. 5. To this, the learned counsel submits that charge sheet has already been submitted. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and upon going through the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, it appears that the petitioner and the victim developed friendship over the phone and thereafter the alleged incident occurred, and when the petitioner refused to marry the victim, the case was instituted. 7. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on 2026:JHHC:26285 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Rajmahal in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.54 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:01.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:01.09.2026