IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 122 ROSHNI AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present : RAMESH KUMARI 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents the hands of respondent representation dated 08.06.2026 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner the Senior of Police Garsha Hoshiarpur present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioners respondent No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision: ROSHNI AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conference). Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. **** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 representation dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, Deputy Superintendent of Police Garshankar, Hoshiarpur and S.H.O., Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-5) raising their petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this sta s would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7499-2026 Date of decision:25.06.2026 …. Petitioners …. Respondents JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI , Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at and to take action on their (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that recently filed a representation on 08.06.2026 before Hoshiarpur, Deputy Superintendent nkar, Hoshiarpur and S.H.O., Garhshankar, District grievances as mentioned in the petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to of Police, Hoshiarpur to decide Constitution the official at their submitted that before Hoshiarpur, Deputy Superintendent nkar, Hoshiarpur and S.H.O., Garhshankar, District in the petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action ge, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to decide JYOTI 2026.06.25 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Court, has submits that the paperbook be supplied t 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide aforesaid petitioners order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners in order to protect their life and liberty 25.06.2026 Jyoti-IV CRWP-7499-2026 the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner action thereon. motion. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide aid representation dated 08.06.2026 s within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the s, the official respondents would prov in order to protect their life and liberty. 25.06.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable : -2- the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the from today, by passing a speaking accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the , the official respondents would provide them adequate security (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No necessary who is present in State and the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of , without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is the of the from today, by passing a speaking accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the them adequate security ) JYOTI 2026.06.25 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document