IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 ANJALI AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present : RAMESH KUMARI 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of a writ of respondents the hands of respondent representation dated 18.06.2026 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned coun the petitioner the Commissioner grievances as been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the appropriate directions are issued to Police, Jhajjar petitioners IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision: ANJALI AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Anu Malika Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Grewal, D.A.G., Haryana. **** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 6 to 8 representation dated 18.06.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Commissioner of Police, Jhajjar (Annexure P grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet een considered and no action has been taken thereon. submitted that at this stage, the petitioner appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. Jhajjar to decide the aforesaid representation s and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7522-2026 Date of decision:25.06.2026 …. Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …. Respondents JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Grewal, D.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution mandamus directing the official to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at and to take action on their representation dated 18.06.2026 (Annexure P-5). sel for the petitioners has submitted that recently filed a representation on 18.06.2026 before Jhajjar (Annexure P-5) raising their petition but the same has not yet been taken thereon. He further petitioners would be satisfied if respondent No.3- Commissioner of decide the aforesaid representation filed by the necessary action thereon. Constitution the official at their submitted that before their petition but the same has not yet further satisfied if of filed by the JYOTI 2026.06.25 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Deepak Grewal, D.A.G., Haryana, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 3 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 18.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. (RAMESH KUMARI) 25.06.2026 JUDGE Jyoti-IV Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No JYOTI 2026.06.25 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document