Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010449762024
2026:CGHC:27665-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 512 of 2024 Sant Kumar Singh S/o Shri Heeralal Singh Aged About 54 Years Working On The Post Of Panchayat Secretary, R/o Village Tengani, Post - Girjapur, Tahsil - Patna, District Koriya, Baikunthpur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home (Jail), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Post Office Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Superintendent Of Police Koriya, Baikunthpur, District - Koriya Chhattisgarh 3 - The Station House Officer Police Station - Patna, District - Koriya, Baikunthpur Chhattisgarh 4 - Neelkanth Singh S/o Amar Sai Gond Aged About 42 Years, 5 - Krishna Singh @ Kuber Singh S/o Pratap Singh Aged About 29 Years, 6 - Vijay Kumar Singh S/o Kunwar Singh Gond Aged About 41 Years, 7 - Sona Singh S/o Shrawan Kumar Singh Aged About 28 Years, 8 - Sanju Kumar Singh S/o Dhirsai Gond Aged About 26 Years, 9 - Sonu @ Bhuneshwar Vishwakarma S/o Ramgopal Vishwakarma Aged About 27 Years, 10 - Rajaram S/o Sundar Singh Aged About 35 Years, 11 - Radhe Vishwakarma S/o Basant Vishwakarma Aged About 28 Years, BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.07.06 18:28:24 +0530
2 Respondents No.4 to 11 are Residents of Village Tengani, Post - Girjapur, Tahsil - Patna, District Koriya, Baikunthpur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondents No.1 to 3/State For Respondents No.4 to 11 : : Mr.Sanghrash Pandey, Government Advocate Ms.Chetna Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
06 .07
.2026
1. Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant writ petition. However, Mr.Sanghrash Pandey, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1 to 3/State and Ms.Chetna Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 to 11, are present.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
“10.1 issue notices to the respondents, returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 set-aside the impugned FIR, charge-sheet filed against the petitioner and the order dated 08.12.2023 passed in Criminal Case No.1187/2023 by which the learned trial court has taken cognizance
3 of the offences vide Annexure P-1. 10.3 issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to enquire the matter fairly and properly on the complaint/representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure P-2 dated 02.11.2023, in the ends of justice. 10.4 grant any other relief(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the
facts & circumstances of the case, in in the interest of justice. 10.5 Cost of the petition.”
3. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition when the case is called out.
4. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim relief granted on 13.01.2025 stands vacated.
6. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for information and necessary action. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu