APHC010523532009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS I.A.No.1 of 2026 IN/AND APPEAL SUIT No.19 of 2009 & I.A.No.2 of 2009 (CROSS OBJECTION No.1319 of 2009) Between: 1. PASUPULETI RAVI SANKAR, S/O. P.VENKATASWAMY, HINDU PENSIONER R/O. D.NO. 6-4-21, MARUTHI NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. PASUPULETI SUBBALAKSHMAMMA, W/O.LATE P.RAVI SANKAR, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-4-21, MARUTHI NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. BEING REP. BY APPELLANT NO.3 HEREIN GPA HOLDER I.E. PASUPULETI SAI RAM AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 9.12.2025 VIDE I.A.NO.1 OF 2025 IN A.S.NO.19 OF 2009 3. PASUPULETI SAI RAM, S/O.LATE P.RAVI SANKAR, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO.202, NAKSHATRA APARTMENTS, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. PASUPULETI SAI KRISHNA, S/O.LATE P.RAVI SANKAR, AGED 47 YEARS, W/O.LATE P.RAVI SANKAR, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6- 4-21, MARUTHI NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTHAPURAMU DSITRICT. BEING REP. BY APPELLANT NO.3 HEREIN GPA HOLDER I.E. PASUPULETI SAI RAM AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 9.12.2025 VIDE I.A.NO.2 OF 2025 IN A.S.NO.19 OF 2009 5. THUKKARAJU SAI SUKUMARI, D/O.LATE W/O.LATE P.RAVI SANKAR, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-4-21, MARUTHI NAGAR, 2 ANANTAPUR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. APPELLANT NOS.2 TO 5 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF SOLE APPELLANT VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 30.09.2024 IN I.A.NO.1 OF 2021 IN A.S.NO.19 OF 2009 ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. PASUPULETI PULLAMMA, W/O. LATE MUNAIAH, HINDU DEPENDENT C/O. P.LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, LOCAL FUND AUDIT OFFICE, KURNOOL COLLECTORATE, 2. P CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. LATE MUNAIAH BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 6-3-142, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. P LAKSHMI KANATHAMMA, W/O. D.NAGABHUSHANAM, D/O. P.MUNAIAH, HINDU LOCAL FUND AUDIT OFFICE, KURNOOL COLLECTORATE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. P RAMALAKSHMAMMA, D/O. LATE P.MUNAIAH WORKING IN SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA ENGINEERING COLLEGE,GOOTY ANANTAPUR ROAD, NH-7, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. DONAKONDA MADHURI, D/O. LATE D.NAGABHUSHANAM, HINDU C/O. P.LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, LOCAL FUND AUDIT DEPARTMENT, COLLECTORATE, KURNOOL, 6. DONAKONDA MADHUPRIYA, D/O. LATE D.NAGABHUSHANAM, HINDU C/O. P.LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, LOCAL FUND AUDIT DEPARTMENT, COLLECTORATE, KURNOOL. BEING REP. BY RESPONDENT NO.5 HEREIN GPA HOLDER I.E. DONAKONDA MADHURI AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 9.12.2025 VIDE I.A.NO.3 OF 2025 IN A.S.NO.19 OF 2009 7. SIRIGIREDDY ANASUYAMMA, W/O. LATE D.NAGABHUSHANAM, HINDU C/O. P.LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, LOCAL FUND AUDIT DEPARTMENT, COLLECTORATE, KURNOOL. 8. R PADMA SUVARNA, W/O. A.SURESH KUMAR, HINDU WORKING AS LECTURER IN PHYSICS, INTEL COLLEGE, R/O. D.NO. 1-4-167, KAMALA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR TOWN. G.P.A HOLDER I.E P.CHANDRA SEKHAR,S/O. LATE MUNAIAHBUSINESS,R/O.D.NO.6- 3-142,RAMNAGAR,ANANTHAPURAM. AS PER THE COURT 3 ORDER DATED 23.01.2026 VIDE I.A NO.4 OF 2025 IN A.S.NO.19 OF 2009 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. K MANASA 2. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR 2. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 4 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS I.A.No.1 of 2026 IN/AND APPEAL SUIT No.19 of 2009 & I.A.No.2 of 2009 (Cross Objection No.1319 of 2009) COMMON JUDGMENT: The appeal in A.S.No.19 of 2009 is filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.11.2008 passed in O.S.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, (FTC), Anantapur. 2. The I.A.No.2 of 2009 (Cross Objection No.1319 of 2009) is preferred by the respondents/defendants. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up, both the parties i.e. appellants as well respondents jointly filed the I.A.No.1 of 2026 under Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C., to record the joint compromise memo, which is filed along with this application, and to pass a decree in terms of compromise as mentioned in the said joint compromise memo. 4. Both the parties present before the Court, they admitted the terms of compromise mentioned in the said joint compromise memo as true and correct, gave consent to record the same. 5. Both the parties have filed their photocopies of Aadhaar cards and they were identified by their respective learned counsel. 6. Pursuant to the above, I.A.No.1 of 2026 is ordered by recording compromise between the parties as per the terms of compromise mentioned 5 in the joint compromise memo, which shall be part and parcel of the Judgment and Decree in the present Appeal Suit No.19 of 2009. 7. Since the joint compromise memo is accepted by both the parties and in view of the above mentioned circumstances, the appeal in A.S.No.19 of 2009 as well the I.A.No.2 of 2009 (Cross-Objection No.1319 of 2009) are disposed of by granting a decree in-terms of compromise arrived at I.A.No.1 of 2026. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date:04.02.2026 KNN 6 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS I.A.NO.1 OF 2026 IN/AND Appeal Suit No.19 of 2009 & I.A.No.2 of 2009 (Cross Objection No.1319 of 2009) (Common Judgment) DATE:04.02.2026 KNN