Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2479 (UTT)

FARJAND ALI ALIAS NANHE v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/309/2026 · 2026-02-26

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS Correction Application (MCRC No. 01 of 2026) In BA1 No. 309 of 2026 Farjand Ali alias Nanhe --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Correction Application has been filed by the Applicant submitting that due to an inadvertent typographical error, “Section 27A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985” was not mentioned in the Bail Application along with Sections 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Section 279 read with Sections 109, 121, 132, 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, and consequently the same was also omitted in the order dated 26.02.2026 passed by this Court. 4. The Correction Application is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the order dated 26.02.2026 is corrected to the aforesaid extent. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 11.03.2026 Shiksha