( 2026:HHC:41486 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1294 of 2026 Date of decision: 28.09.2026 Sunil Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated nil along with copy of office order dated 04.07.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the case of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-department vide office order dated 04.07.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, at this stage, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 04.07.2026, if he still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 28, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?