CLASSIC ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/26742/2024 · 2026-01-30
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24787 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24787 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010519922024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26742/2024 Between:
1. CLASSIC ENTERPRISES, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. VECHALAPU GOVINDA, S/O. V. APPALNAIDU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, D.NO. 30-5-4/1, BSNL OFFICE BACK SIDE ROAD, KRISHNA GARDENS, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE AND EMPOWERMENT DEPARTMENT REP., BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT PURCHASE COMMITTEE, DISTRICT WOMEN, CHILD AND WELFARE AND EMPOWERMENT OFFICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI
4. DISTRICT WOMEN, , CHILD AND WELFARE AND EMPOWERMENT OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI
5. PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN, CHILD AND WELFARE OFFICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI
6. M/S BERACHAH ENTERPRISE, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in discarding the Petitioner whose position in the bid shown as L3 to be and as eligible bidder to get the bid in respect of tender notification no. 73947/2024/SA Dt 20-08-2024 issued by 3rd Respondent who confirmed an invalid bid under issue proceedings R.C.No.73947/2024/SA Dt 10-10-2024 in favour of 6th Respondent though he was at L4 position in the bid is contrary to the Principals of natural Justice, Equity and contrary to tender document conditions are illegal, arbitrary, unfair, contrary to law, against to the Principles of the Natural Justice and against to the Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Indian Constitution, and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 to cancel the 6th Respondent illegal bid Order under proceedings R.C.No.73947/2024/SA Dt 10-10-2024 and thereafter to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 to elect and select the Petitioner as eligible bidder to supply the necessary items covered under tender notification no.
73947/2024/SA Dt 20-08-2024 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to pass an Order to suspend the impugned proceedings R.C.NO.73947/2024/SA vide dt. 10-10-2024 pending disposal of the Petition and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to pass an Order to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to perform their supply of goods through their previous existing bidder pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following:
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26742/2024
ORDER:
Heard Ms.M.Venkata Surya Rachana,
learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.M.Venkata Surya Rachana, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.01.2026 BSP/TPS
5
38
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.26742 of 2024
31.01.2026 BSP/TPS