APHC010514322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4420 OF 2024 Between: 1. DEVARAPALLI VIJAYAMMA, W/O, RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. VILLAGE ORGANISATION ASSISTANT, R/O. D. NO.3- 140, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, YADDANAPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523301. ...PETITIONER AND 1. J VENKATA MURALI KRISHNA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. P PADMAJA, PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. S VENKAT RAO, PROJECT MANAGER, IKP, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. K RAVI KUMAR, COMMUNITY COORDINATOR, O/O. IKP, DRDA, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, YADDANAPUDI MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. V SHANTHI, MAHILA MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OPERATIVE THRIFT SOCIETY ANANTHAVARAM-I REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, YADDANAPUDI MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. LAKSHMANA CHARYA, AREA COORDINATOR, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, YADDANAPUDI MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 SRS, J C.C.No.4420 of 2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU 2. . The Court made the following order: Heard Ms. K.Krishna Deepthi, learned counsel representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.Raju, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 20.09.2024 in W.P.No.20592 of 2024. 3. The petitioner has filed the aforementioned writ petition complaining that the respondents are not allowing the petitioner from discharging their duties as Village Organisation Assistants (VOAs) of Ananthavaram Village in Bapatla District. 4. The said writ petition was disposed of on 20.09.2024 and the operative portion is read as follows: “Given the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the aforementioned circular issued by the Principal Secretary, SERP, and the instructions furnished by the Project Director, DRDA, Bapatla District, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, with the consent of the learned counsel on either side, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the petitioner’s discharging 3 SRS, J C.C.No.4420 of 2024 duties as VOA of 6th respondent Society-Mahila Mutually Aided Co-operative Thrift Society in Ananthavaram Village, Yaddanapudi Mandal, Bapatla District. No order as to costs.” 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was specifically pleaded that the respondents are interfering with the petitioner in discharging their duties as Village Organization Assistant. 6. The 3rd respondent filed the counter-affidavit. Along with the counter- affidavit, a resolution was passed by the respective societies were annexed. A perusal of the resolution discloses that the petitioner was removed as Village Organization Assistant of the respective societies and that the members of the society elected as Village Organization Assistant. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any violation of the order 20.09.2024 in W.P.No.20592 of 2024. [ 8. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 29.01.2026 BSK 4 SRS, J C.C.No.4420 of 2024 176 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4420 OF 2024 Date: 29.01.2026 BSK