APHC010513502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4437/2024 Between: 1. THUMMA OMKAR, S/O T. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION- ADVOCATE, 3-89/11-2, USHODAYA NAGAR, TIRUCHANUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. R MADHURI, Panchayat Secretary, Tiruchanoor Gram Panchayat office, Tiruchanoor Village, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish respondent for willful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders passed by his Lordship Honble Sri Justice SUBBA REDDY SATTI in WP.No.5260 of 2024 dated 07-03-2024, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the order dated. 07-03-2024 passed by Hon'ble his Lordship Hon'ble Sri Justice SUBBA REDDY SATTI in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in WP.No.5260 of 2024 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: Heard Sri P.Jithendra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Sudhir, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the interim order dated 07.03.2024 in W.P.No.5260 of 2024. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent would collectively submit that in pursuance of the interim order, when the unofficial respondent in the writ petition made a construction, the respondent issued notice. Challenging the said notice, the unofficial respondent filed another writ petition, wherein a coordinate bench of this Court granted an interim order. 4. Thus, as seen from the above submissions, the respondent authority set law into motion. Given the facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any violation of the interim order. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 02.01.2026 SNI 3 262 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4437/2024 Date: 02.01.2026 SNI