IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 1893/2026 Decided on: 28.09.2026 Anita Devi …Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Pankaj Sawant, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. D.S. Kainthla, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Following order was passed in the matter on 03.09.2026: - “Notice. Mr. D.S.Kainthal, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Petitioner’s grievance is that though the respondents have issued consideration order on 09.09.2025 pursuant to the decision rendered on 17.07.2025 in CWP No.11443 of 2025, however, till date, neither the pay fixation of the petitioner has been carried out pursuant to the above consideration order nor the consequential benefits flowing in terms of the aforesaid consideration order have been released to her. If that is so, the respondents are directed to file compliance affidavit/reply alongwith the pay fixation order and the detail of consequential benefits admissible & released to the petitioner, within two weeks. This shall be subject to costs of Rs.2500/- to be paid to the petitioner on the next date, in case consequential action upon consideration order dated 09.09.2025 has not been 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 taken by the respondents till date, thereby compelling her to institute this execution petition. List after two weeks.” 2. Pursuant to the above, learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record office order dated 12.06.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner and fixing her revised pay scale. 3. Taking note of the above, the present petition stands disposed of, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her grievance, if any, in accordance with law. Also taking note of the fact that the aforesaid decision has been passed by the respondents prior to the imposition of cost upon the respondents vide order dated 03.09.2026, the cost imposed on the said order stands waived off. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 28th September, 2026(rohit)