Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24771 (KAR)

MRS. M.A. RADHA, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18114/2026 · 2026-06-22

Suraj Govindaraj

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31485 WP No. 18114 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18114 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MRS. M.A. RADHA, W/O MR. NARAYANA K.L., AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT KOLUR, BETTAGERE, MUDIGERE, CHICKMAGALUR-577 113, KARNATAKA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHWIN JOYSTON KUTINHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AND PRISON, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SHIVAMOGGA-577 222. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND INSPECTOR, GENERAL OF PRISON AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, NO.04, SESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.H. DEVARAJ, GA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE PAROLE REJECTION ENDORSEMENT DATED 23-04-2026 BEARING Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31485 WP No. 18114 of 2026 REFERENCE NO. ¸ÀA: PÉÃPÁ²/eÉ 3/359/2026-27 vide ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioner – wife of the detenu – Narayana (CTP No.01249) is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Set aside the Parole rejection endorsement dated 23-04-2026 bearing reference no. ¸ÀA: PÉÃPÁ²/eÉ 3/359/2026-27 vide Annexure-A and consequently; b) Pass order/direction by the nature of writ of mandamus to the Respondent No.02 to release the husband of the Petitioner i.e. Sri. Narayana S/o Lakshmana bearing CTP NO. 01249 on Parole for the period of 90 days. c) Also grant any other order/direction that this Hon'ble court may deem fit to grant under the facts and circumstances in the interest of justice and Equity. 2. The detenu had been convicted in Spl.C(P) No.11/2022 for offence under Section 4(2), 6 of POCSO Act r/w 376(2)(n), 376(AB) of IPC by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTSC-I), Chikkamagaluru and sentenced on 19.04.2023 with the highest of the sentence being imprisonment for - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31485 WP No. 18114 of 2026 20 years. The detenu has served a period of 4 years 1 months 19 days of imprisonment as on 27.04.2026 and his conduct in jail is said to be satisfactory. The petitioner having made an application for parole, the same came to be rejected on account of adverse report having received by the police. 3. The reason sought for the parole is on the ground of carrying out agricultural activities. No particular document has been produced to substantiate the same. No grounds being made out, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 72