IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 126 MEHAKDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present : RAMESH KUMARI 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of respondents the hands of respondent representation dated 23.06.2026 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, the petitioner the Senior (Annexure P petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has taken thereon. would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to Senior Superintendent aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision: MEHAKDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Sanjay Khan, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. **** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7 representation dated 23.06.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Senior Superintendent of Police, (Annexure P-5) raising their grievances as petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to Superintendent of Police, District SAS Nagar, Mohali aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7537-2026 Date of decision: 25.06.2026 MEHAKDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER …. Petitioners …. Respondents JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution a writ of mandamus directing the official to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at and to take action on their representation dated 23.06.2026 (Annexure P-5). learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that recently filed a representation on 23.06.2026 before of Police, District SAS Nagar, Mohali grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- District SAS Nagar, Mohali to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action Constitution the official at their submitted that before District SAS Nagar, Mohali present been s - decide the necessary action JYOTI 2026.06.25 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Court, has submits that the paperbook be supplied to h 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide aforesaid petitioners order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners in order to protect their life and liberty 25.06.2026 Jyoti-IV CRWP-7537-2026 Notice of motion. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide aforesaid representation dated 23.06.2026 s within a period of 15 days from today, by accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the s, the official respondents would provide in order to protect their life and liberty. 25.06.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable : -2- Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in ce on behalf of the respondents-State and the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the dated 23.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the from today, by passing a speaking accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the , the official respondents would provide them adequate security (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of , without anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is the of the passing a speaking accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the them adequate security ) JYOTI 2026.06.25 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document