CWP-19357 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (217) Samaira Mittal Union of India through Secretary CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as after correction in marks, the result has been uploaded on the CBSE website, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. situated at Singapore. However, h the requisite marks, at that time. Now, the respondent the petitioner’s marks sheet, which reflects that the petitioner has obtained counsel for the petitioner has respondent- earlier error occurred, 19357-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Samaira Mittal Versus Union of India through Secretary HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.1-Union of India. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3-CBSE **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as after correction in marks, the result has been uploaded on the CBSE website, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant petition has become infructuous. He further submits that the petitioner has applied to a university Singapore. However, her claim was re requisite marks, at that time. Now, the respondent the petitioner’s marks sheet, has uploaded fresh result on the CBSE website, which reflects that the petitioner has obtained counsel for the petitioner has made a prayer that in case, the CBSE, issues a certificate in this regard, disclosing therein, the earlier error occurred, the grievance of the petitioner 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19357-2026 Date of Decision : 25.06.2026 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondent KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Sr. Panel Counsel Union of India. ep Parmar, Advocate CBSE. earned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as after correction in her marks, the result has been uploaded on the CBSE website, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant petition has become infructuous. He further submits that the petitioner has applied to a university claim was rejected as she did not acquire requisite marks, at that time. Now, the respondent-CBSE, after re-chekcing has uploaded fresh result on the CBSE website, which reflects that the petitioner has obtained more than 96% marks. Learned made a prayer that in case, the a certificate in this regard, disclosing therein, the the grievance of the petitioner would be solved for petitioner submits that her marks, the result has been uploaded on the CBSE website, and therefore, the He further submits that the petitioner has applied to a university she did not acquire chekcing has uploaded fresh result on the CBSE website, earned made a prayer that in case, the a certificate in this regard, disclosing therein, the would be solved for MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.25 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-19357 getting admis 3. petitioner, therefore, at this stage, this Court deems it apt to relegate the petitioner, to file a representation with the respondent relief (supra). In case, such a representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order, the latter shall make an endeavour to period of 15 days, thereaf 4. June 25, 2026 Manpreet 19357-2026 getting admission in the desired university Since the above said prayer has not been made in the instant petitioner, therefore, at this stage, this Court deems it apt to relegate the petitioner, to file a representation with the respondent (supra). In case, such a representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order, the latter shall make an endeavour to decide the same by passing a speaking order, period of 15 days, thereafter, considering the grievance raised by her Consequently, the instant petition is 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 Since the above said prayer has not been made in the instant petitioner, therefore, at this stage, this Court deems it apt to relegate the petitioner, to file a representation with the respondent-CBSE, seeking the (supra). In case, such a representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order, the latter shall decide the same by passing a speaking order, within a , considering the grievance raised by her. Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Since the above said prayer has not been made in the instant petitioner, therefore, at this stage, this Court deems it apt to relegate the CBSE, seeking the (supra). In case, such a representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order, the latter shall within a MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.25 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment