09/04 2026 AD/31/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/22487/2025 SKM INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCE & RESEARCH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Mr. Raj Mohan Chattoraj, Advocate Ms. Saolini Bose, Advocate Ms. Shreyosi Chakraborty, Advocate …...for the Petitioners Mr. Debasis Sur, Advocate Mr. Joy Bhattacharjee, Advocate ……for the Respondent No. 6 Mr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Ld. G.P. Mr. Rajat Dutta, Advocate ……for the State 1. The report filed in the form of affidavit by the respondent no. 4 and the affidavit-in-exception to the report filed by the respondent no. 3, is taken on record. 2. Mr. Chattoraj, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner hands up a copy of the Notification dated 08.04.2026. Let such Notification be kept with the record. 3. According to Mr. Chattoraj, the grievance of the petitioner has sufficiently been addressed by way of this Notification. 4. The petitioner will be entitled to conduct the new course as per clause 4.3 of the Notification No. F.No.Z/103/2024- AHS-DOHFW Department dated 08.04.2026. 5. With the afore-stated observations, the writ-petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2