Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31333 RP No. 325 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REVIEW PETITION NO.325 OF 2026 IN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1631/2025 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. B N RAJAMMA W/O B NAGARAJ D/O LATE THAMMANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.27, “MANJULA” SUDDAGUNTE PALYA C.V. RAMAN NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 093
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. HIMA KIRANA S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. K S JAYAVANI W/O K. RAJA RAO D/O LATE SRINIVASA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO.3242, 21ST 'B' MAIN ROAD HAMPI CIRCLE VIJAYANAGAR 2ND PHASE 'E' BLOCK MYSURU - 570 017
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31333 RP No. 325 of 2026
2. SMT. K. RAMABAI @ S. LAKSHMI, W/O LATE R. SATHYANARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/AT “SRI GURUPRASANNA” ANJENAYA LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA (THINDLU) BENGALURU - 560 097
3. SMT. K. THULASI W/O LATE SRINIVASA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO.1978, 8TH CROSS KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560 078
4. SMT. UMA DEVI @ UMA RAO K.
W/O SURYANARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.64, 13TH MAIN RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK SRINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 050
5. SMT. K. SAVITHRI W/O NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.860, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, KONANAKUNTE BENGALURU-560 062
6. SMT. K. LEELAVATHI W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.5156, 4TH CROSS RAILWAY STATION, GUBBI TOWN TUMAKURU-572 216
7. SMT. KAMALA R W/O LATE K. RAGHAVENDRA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31333 RP No. 325 of 2026
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.17, GAVIGANGADHARA DEVASTANA GAVIPURAM CHATRA BLOCK BENGALURU -560 019
8. SRI. K. RAVI S/O LATE KRISHNAMURTHACHAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.39, 1ST MAIN 24TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR YELAHANKA BENGALURU -560 064
9. SRI. K. PRASAD, S/O LATE KRISHNAMURTHACHAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT AREHALLI, A.G.S. LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 061
10. SRI. C. NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT NO.14, NARAYANAPPA FARM LAYOUT GEDDALAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 094
11. SMT. LAKSHAMMA W/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK
12. SRI. C.J. NARENDRA S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31333 RP No. 325 of 2026
13. SRI.
C.J. THAMMEGOWDA S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK
14. SRI. P. RAJA NAIDU S/O GANGULAU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT PERAIGHAGARIPALLI E-KOTHUR POST IRALA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH-517 173
15. SMT. P. JAYAMMA W/O P. RAJA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT PERAIGHAGARIPALLI E-KOTHUR POST, IRALA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 517 173
16. SRI. BABU PATHIPATI S/O P. RAJA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT PERAIGHAGARIPALLI E-KOTHUR POST, IRALA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 173
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.03.2026 PASSED ON I.A. NO.4/2025 IN RSA NO.1631/2025 AND CONSEQUENTLY RECALL THE ORDER DATED 20.11.2025 DISMISSING THE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN AND ETC. - 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31333 RP No. 325 of 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
The office has raised the objection that this review petition is not maintainable in view of the Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC since R.S.A.No.1631/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the appellant.
2. The scope of review is if there is any error apparent on the face of the record while passing the order, then only the Court can review its order. But in the case on hand, R.S.A.No.1631/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the appellant and not on merits. Such being the case, the question of consideration of this review petition does not arise. Hence, review petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, review petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN