APHC010519872003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 3784/2003 Between: 1. K.Y. DORATHY, S/O. LATE DAS WILSON EMPLOYEE R/O. 9-3-519, REGIMENTAL BAZAR, SECUNDERABAD ...APPELLANT AND 1. Y GRACE PARI GRACE, W/O. LATE DAS WILSON EMPLOYEE R/O. CHURCH STREET, BAPATISHNAGAR. VIJAYAWADA 2. Y W SARANSON, S/O. LATE DAS WILSON STUDENT R/O. CHURCH STREET, BAPATISHNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA 3. Y GOLD WILSON SHARE WILSON, D/O. LATE DAS WILSON STUDENT R/O. CHURCH STREET, BAPATISHNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA 4. SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER SECUNDERABAD 5. FAMILY COURT, VIJAYAWADA ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the Judgment and decree of the Family Court, Vijayawada, dated 11-12-1998, made in OS No.32/1996. IA NO: 1 OF 1999(CMP 1601 OF 1999 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2002(CMP 16674 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2003(CMP 10059 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to conver the CMA 157 OF 1999 into a regular appeal and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 1430 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G V L MURHTY 2. G V L MURTHY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents 1 to 3 for declaration, was decreed. Challenging the same, the 1st defendant filed this appeal. 2. On 11.12.2025, the following order was passed: 3 < At request of Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the appellant, to obtain latest instructions in the matter and also to prepare his paper book, list under the same caption on 26.12.2025. No further adjournments will be granted.= 3. No representation for the appellant. 4. Learned counsel representing Sri G.V.L.Murthy, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 is present. 5. The Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 07.01.2026 Pab 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 3784/2003 DATE: 07.01.2026 Pab