Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2475 (GAU)

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. JESMINA KHATUN AND 5 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/8/2026 · 2026-02-15

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010262722025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/8/2026 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5TH FLOOR, (BESIDE IDBI BUILDING) ANIL PLAZA, G.S. ROAD, ABC GUWAHATI 781005 VERSUS JESMINA KHATUN AND 5 ORS W/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM, R/O VILL. KHANDIKAR, P.O. DEULKUCHI, P.S. TAMULPUR, PIN 781354, DIST. BAKSA (BTR), ASSAM. 2:NAZIA MAHZABIN D/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM R/O VILL. KHANDIKAR P.O. DEULKUCHI P.S. TAMULPUR PIN 781354 DIST. BAKSHA (BTR) ASSAM. 3:INAYA MAHZABIN D/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM R/O VILL. KHANDIKAR P.O. DEULKUCHI P.S. TAMULPUR PIN 781354 DIST. BAKSHA (BTR) ASSAM. 4:RAFIZ UDDIN AHMED S/O NATU ALI R/O VILL. KHANDIKAR P.O. DEULKUCHI P.S. TAMULPUR Page No.# 2/3 PIN 781354 DIST. BAKSHA (BTR) ASSAM. 5:RAHIMA KHATUN W/O RAFIZ UDDIN AHMED R/O VILL. KHANDIKAR P.O. DEULKUCHI P.S. TAMULPUR PIN 781354 DIST. BAKSHA (BTR) ASSAM. 6:SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O BASIR ALI R/OV ILL. KHANDIKAR P.O. DEULKUCHI P.S. TAMULPUR PIN 781354 DIST. BAKSHA (BTR) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA, MRS L SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M KHAN (R-1 TO 3), MS J AKTAR (R-1 TO 3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 16.02.2026 1. Heard Ms. L. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant/Insurance Company. Also heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the claimants/respondents. 2. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed by the applicant/Insurance Company praying for condoning the delay of 28 days in preferring the connected MAC Appeal. Page No.# 3/3 3. Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the claimants/respondents does not raise any objection to the said prayer considering the grounds stated in the application. 4. As the prayer for condonation of delay has not been opposed to by the learned counsel for the claimants/respondents as well as the grounds stated in the application are found to be sufficient ground which prevented the applicant in preferring the connected appeal within prescribed period of limitation, the delay of 28 days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned and this interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. 5. The Registry is directed to register the connected MAC Appeal and list the same for admission after a week on a date to be fixed by the Registry. 6. The name of Mr. M. Khan may be reflected in the cause-list as engaged counsel for the respondents/claimants. JUDGE Comparing Assistant