APHC010514312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4416 OF 2024 Between: 1. GOLLA SUBHASHINI, W/O RAJARAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT D NO 7- 156, MALA PALLI, PANGULURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 523261. 2. SHAIK MEERA BI,, W/O SHAIK NAGUR MEERA VALI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT D NO 3-186, BATTULA STREET, PANGULURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -523261. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. J VENKATA MURALI KRISHNA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. P PADMAJA, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. JYOTHI PRASAD BABU, THE PROJECT MANAGER, IKP, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, BAPATIA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. CH SALMON, THE COMMUNITY COORDINATOR, O/O. IKP, DRDA, PANGALURU VILLAGE, PANGALURU MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. B NAGA LAKSHMI, PRESIDENT, THE PANGULURU -1 MAHILA PARSASPARA SAHAYAKA SAHAKARA GRAMA SANGAM, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. B NAGA LAKSHMI, PRESIDENT, THE PANGULURU -2 MAHILA PARSASPARA SAHAYAKA SAHAKARAGRAMA SANGAM, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 SRS, J C.C.No.4416 of 2024 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU The Court made the following order: Heard Ms. K.Krishna Deepthi, learned counsel representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.Raju, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 20.09.2024 in W.P.No.19484 of 2024. 3. The petitioners have filed the aforementioned writ petition complaining that the respondents are not allowing the petitioner from discharging their duties as Village Organisation Assistants (VOAs) of Panguluru Village in Bapatla District. 4. The said writ petition was disposed of on 20.09.2024 and the operative portion is read as follows: “Given the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the aforementioned circular issued by the Principal Secretary, SERP, and the instructions furnished by the Project Director, DRDA, Bapatla District, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, with the consent of the learned counsel on either side, directing the respondent Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere with the petitioners’ discharging duties as VOAs of Panguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatla District. No order as to costs.” 3 SRS, J C.C.No.4416 of 2024 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was specifically pleaded that the respondents are interfering with the petitioner in discharging their duties as Village Organization Assistant. 6. The 3rd respondent filed the counter-affidavit. Along with the counter- affidavit, a resolution was passed by the respective societies were annexed. A perusal of the resolution discloses that the petitioners were removed as Village Organization Assistant of the respective societies and that the members of the society elected as Village Organization Assistant. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any violation of the order 20.09.2024 in W.P.No.19484 of 2024. [ 8. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 29.01.2026 BSK 4 SRS, J C.C.No.4416 of 2024 175 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4416 OF 2024 Date: 29.01.2026 BSK