Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24747 (AP)

SMT.ANANTHOJI SWAPNA @ PREETHI v. SMT.ANANTHOJI BHARATHI DEVI

CRLP/7561/2021 · 2026-02-23

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010513322021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7561/2021 Between: 1.SMT.ANANTHOJI SWAPNA @ PREETHI, W/O DASARI PRAVEEN KUMAR, FEMALE, 36 YEARS, EMPLOYED IN AUSTRALIAN PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 49 DRYSDALE DR LAMBTON NEW SOUTH WALES, 2299, AUSTRALIA. 2.ANANTHOJI @ ANNTOSH SAI KUMAR., S/O GOPINADHAM, MALE, AGED 34 YEARS, EMPLOYED IN AUSTRALIA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 49 DRYSDALE DR LAMBTON NEW SOUTH WALES, 2299, AUSTRALIA. 3.DR. ANANTHOJI GOPINADHAM,, S/O RAJAYYA, MALE, 60 YEARS, DOCTOR BY PROFESSION, R/O H.NO. 7-4-406/3, KALYAN NAGAR, BALANAGAR, R.R. DISTRICT, TELANGANA. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.SMT ANANTHOJI BHARATHI DEVI, W/O SAI CHANDU, (D/O LATE TEKI RAMALINGESWARA RAO) FEMALE, AGED 30 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, PRESENTLY AT FLAT NO.401, S.S. APARTMENTS, AGRAHARAM, VAIBHAV FORT, RAMAKOTI, ELURU-534 001, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP WEST ,GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2.THE STATE, SHO, DISHA WOMEN P.S., ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. THROUGH-ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, A.P. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.B V KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even on the last occasion also there was no representation. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. In view of the continued absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.02.2026 VTS