Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010515642015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1909/2015 Between:
1. B.VIJAYALAKSHMI,, W/O LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC : HELPER, TCPC, APVCC, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SMT K SARADA DEVI, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.
VIKALANGULA CO-OPERATIVE CORPORATION, VIKALANGULA SANKSHEMA BHAVAN, NALGONDA'X'ROAD, MALAKPET, HYDERABAD.
2. SRI T MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY, THE THEN PROJECT OFFICER, (PREVISOULY) T.C.P.C, A.P. V.C.C, ONGOLE PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASST. DIRECTOR, DISABLED WELFARE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. B SRINIVASA RAO, THE PROJECT OFFICER, (PREVIOUSLY) TRAINING CUM PRODUCTION CENTER, A.P. VIKALANGULA CO- OPERATIVE CORPORATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to initiate the Contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish them suitably Ws 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the Order dt.25.06.2015 passed in WPMP. No. 18178 of 2015 in W.P.No.13867 of 2015 by His Lordship the Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Kantha Rao and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
2
1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1909/2015 ORDER:-
The instant contempt case has been filed alleging the violation of the interim order of this Court passed in W.P.No.13867 of 2015, dated 25.06.2015.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Smt. B. Vijayalakshmi, the sole petitioner is no more and further submitted that the legal representatives of the petitioner are not in touch with him.
3. Recording the above said submission, the contempt case is closed. However, liberty is granted to concerned persons to initiate appropriate action, in accordance with law, if any. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.02.2026 SCH
4
284
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Contempt Case No.1909 of 2015
Date: 24.02.2026
SCH